All cases
Criminal case Final Guilty

200,000 lei distributed in Florești to persuade voters to vote "against" in the constitutional referendum and in favor of a certain candidate in the presidential elections.

Art. 181¹ CC – Electoral corruption. Locality: Florești district

1ra-86/26 Irina Volciuc, Ilia Volciuc

Factual summary

The defendants, as territorial representatives of the political bloc "Victory", participated in an organized mechanism of electoral corruption, through which they received and distributed monetary means (approximately 200,000 lei) through activists, with the aim of persuading voters from the Florești district to vote for a certain candidate in the presidential elections and to opt for "NO" in the constitutional referendum on 20.10.2024.

Specifically, they offered sums of money to voters during meetings with political supporters.

Other property measures: The monetary amounts of 860 lei, 300 lei, 1000 Belarusian rubles, 160 Russian rubles, 5 Romanian lei, and 2 hryvnias were confiscated in favor of the state.

Court Decision

First instance: Conviction
Appeal: Conviction
Cassation: Inadmissible cassation

Financial indicators

115 000,00 MDL
Applied fine
0,00 MDL
Recovered amounts

CRJM expert observation

The appellate court confirms the existence of an organized mechanism of electoral corruption, based on the systematic distribution of financial resources through activists and the use of financial infrastructure (including the PSB application). At the same time, it notes that criminal liability exists even in the case of indirect coordination of payments, without the direct transfer of money.

At the same time, the appellate court corrects the approach of the court of first instance regarding the fate of the assets, emphasizing that the mere use of cards and phones does not justify their destruction, but rather requires their return to the owners, in the absence of the character of prohibited objects or tools specially adapted to the crime.

By maintaining the conviction and declaring the appeals inadmissible, the courts have reinforced the interpretation that the use of organized mechanisms for transferring funds to voters, including through financial applications and intermediaries, may constitute electoral corruption even in the absence of direct contact between the organizers and the final beneficiaries of the amounts.

Case timeline

Criminal case
200,000 lei distributed in Florești to persuade voters to vote "against" in the constitutional referendum and in favor of a certain candidate in the presidential elections.
Irina Volciuc
Ilia Volciuc
01
20.10.2024
Period of facts
September - November 2024
The defendants Volciuc Irina and Volciuc Ilia coordinated an organized mechanism for distributing monetary funds (≈200,000 lei) through activists, with the aim of influencing the vote in the presidential elections and the referendum on 20.10.2024.
02
30.11.2024
Initiation of legal proceedings
30.11.2024 – 10.12.2024 Conducting searches (of the vehicle and residence), seizing bank cards, phones, and money; subsequently, obtaining bank statements from financial institutions and recognizing them as evidence.
03
11.03.2025
Sent to trial
11.03.2025
The criminal case was registered at the Court of Soroca.
04
15.10.2025
Verdict pronounced
15.10.2025 – Soroca Court (Florești branch): the defendants were convicted of electoral corruption (art. 181¹ para. (1) CC), and were sentenced to a monetary fine of 1150 u.c. (57,500 lei each).
05
24.12.2025
Appeal
24.12.2025 – Court of Appeal: the appeal filed by the defendants and the lawyer was partially granted; the court found the conviction to be justified but corrected the ruling regarding the material evidence (return of the goods instead of destruction).
06
23.01.2026
Cassation appeal
January 19 and 23, 2026 – Supreme Court: the lawyer and the defendants filed an appeal, requesting acquittal. By the ruling of March 5, 2026, the Supreme Court declared the appeals inadmissible, finding that the arguments presented are merely a disagreement with the assessment of evidence by the lower courts and do not demonstrate the existence of an arbitrary nature of the decisions. The ruling is final.
Receive updates

Subscribe to receive notifications about this case.

Identification data
Case no. 1ra-86/26
PIGD no. 1-25032140-03-1a-12112025
Court Soroca Court
Verdict 15.10.2025
Judges Victoria Robu · Judecătoria Drochia, Rosiţa Rusu-Parii · Judecătoria Soroca, Ghenadie Liulca, Aurelia Andronache., Alexandru Negru · Recursul a fost înregistrat la data de 09 februarie 2026, Leonid Chirtoacă · Recursul a fost înregistrat la data de 09 februarie 2026, Stella Bleșceaga · 19 ianuarie 2026
Prosecutor Gordilă Alexandru
Lawyer Janu Anatolie
Defendants
Irina Volciuc
Ilia Volciuc
Procedural stage
Criminal investigation
Trial
Verdict
4
Appeal
5
Recourse
6
Closed